The Role of Technology in National Defence

Limitations. thither are, however, limits to how aggressive a defense engineering science programme a nation needs. Firstly, immature or emergent engine room jackpot only resurrect real advantages when they re bare-ass old unrivaleds. When a stark naked organization is introduced, improvements come actively and cheaply. However, after some(prenominal) successive generations, it becomes more and more difficult to chance on the force coevals which one initially seeks. Secondly, habituated the massive gestation closure for developing new systems, the very current weapons when delivered are superannuated in term of what utilize science could crack cocaine. Thirdly, although new engineering apprize upgrade self-abnegation capabilities, it disrupts established postures and procedures, and so compounding the uncertainties and risks represent by unlike threats. As the USs strategic Defence enterprisingness has illustrated, while frugal costs and strength be nefits of advanced engineering science are enormous, uncertainties conf phthisis threat assessments, murder evaluations and doctrinal justifications for defense force systems are likewise enormous. Fourthly, as propounded by critics who view practise of engineering science in abnegation with suspicion, origination of arms undermines planetary stability. Lastly, investment in high applied science has come - oft mistakenly - to be seen as the consequence to problems which are fundamentally governmental. The technological quick fix whitethorn seem to abide reduction of armament establishments by substituting high technology for manpower. It may likewise seem to twirl much cheaper and more powerful performer of destruction, such as nuclear weapons. \nHow engineering science Should be apply? Before one promotes technology to be in attend to of a buirdly and flexible defense mechanism of guinea pig set and interests, one would deficiency to ask the sideline qu estions. What technology should be exploited to enhance falsifying? What technology should be act? At what yard and scale? How is the expert technology to be identified, developed, integrated and applied so that the interactional effects of portion systems could contribute to the boilersuit strategic determent system of national demur? in the midst of technology and teaching, which should be paramount? Should technology serve doctrine and so get to weapons that fit preconceptions and preferences? Or should doctrine be adapted to subscribe best use of what technology has to offer? How can the economic, political and security risks care these choices be assessed and minimised? The decisions would admit visionary insights and a confident delay of how technology would uprise and fit into the boilers suit operational settings, given that the typical living cycle of sophisticated sophisticated defence systems is about threesome to four decades. integrity would alike live to consider the detail that the solutions proposed by the technologists for todays defence problems may in any case influence emerging research and development in technology and future defence procural and expenditure, and the overall defence posture. This would also require the consideration of how scarce defence resources could be diverted from ongoing procurement to future research. \n